[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1007588: marked as done (jgraph: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format)

Your message dated Thu, 24 Aug 2023 16:19:26 +0000
with message-id <E1qZD3O-005ldi-63@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1007588: fixed in jgraph 83-24
has caused the Debian Bug report #1007588,
regarding jgraph: please consider upgrading to 3.0 source format
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1007588: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007588
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: jgraph
Version: 83-23
Severity: wishlist
Tags: bookworm sid
Usertags: format1.0 format1.0-nkp-nv

Dear maintainer,

This package is among the few (1.9%) that still use source format 1.0 in
bookworm.  Please upgrade it to source format 3.0, as (1) this format has many
advantages, as documented in https://wiki.debian.org/Projects/DebSrc3.0 ; (2)
this contributes to standardization of packaging practices.

Please note that this is also a sign that the packaging of this software
could maybe benefit from a refresh. It might be a good opportunity to
look at other aspects as well.

It was noticed in https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00096.html
that the conversion for this package is likely trivial, and builds bit-by-bit
identical binary packages.


This mass bug filing was discussed on debian-devel@:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2022/03/msg00074.html

Thanks

Lucas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Source: jgraph
Source-Version: 83-24
Done: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
jgraph, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.

A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 1007588@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org> (supplier of updated jgraph package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2023 10:45:04 +0000
Source: jgraph
Architecture: source
Version: 83-24
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>
Changed-By: Bastian Germann <bage@debian.org>
Closes: 1007588
Changes:
 jgraph (83-24) unstable; urgency=medium
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Convert to source format 3.0. (Closes: #1007588)
Checksums-Sha1:
 943fd3d2a4754a3ac5f462bb6399fedecf2062a4 1486 jgraph_83-24.dsc
 b1cb8559460d442a9739c42c406390b072dceb7b 29988 jgraph_83-24.debian.tar.xz
 a1a1f0fc370bc5c2949f3d44159545e6a22f92fe 5301 jgraph_83-24_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 1d1f3d69b5ede533a97ab2974a7b0eb757338f8022c586110476c63321d48ebc 1486 jgraph_83-24.dsc
 4ca469d0c28438745f96e6ae4064d7df6025352b2c9f91c107433bf397c87558 29988 jgraph_83-24.debian.tar.xz
 905dda95ca4df26597a1ec0434e335e635eadd5127b00edce88881a5a2920d19 5301 jgraph_83-24_source.buildinfo
Files:
 26fe1a43fe9788d55abbc2bd5c1c33cb 1486 math optional jgraph_83-24.dsc
 9f9283ae56858ba6fe35910d28f2cbb9 29988 math optional jgraph_83-24.debian.tar.xz
 50ba6e0891943ccc230d45cb410fd3bb 5301 math optional jgraph_83-24_source.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=OqTU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
Reply to: