Introducing penggy in stable, or removing it?
Opinions? If keeping it, it should at least get an QA upload setting
maintainer appropriately.
--Jeroen
----- Forwarded message from Samuel Mimram <samuel.mimram@ens-lyon.org> -----
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 13:12:50 +0100
From: Samuel Mimram <samuel.mimram@ens-lyon.org>
To: Martin Michlmayr <tbm@cyrius.com>, 266325@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#266325: remove
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
>reassign 266325 ftp.debian.org
>retitle 266325 Please remove penggy
>thanks
>
>RoQA; orphaned, never part of a stable release
Hello,
Even though penggy hasn't had a release for more than 1.5 year and does
not seem to be active anymore, there isn't any important bug filed
against it (only wishlists for debconf templates) and it is currently
the only way to connect to the AOL provider, at least for 56k
connections (like the one I'm using right now).
Therefore I'd rather not have this package removed from Debian unless it
turns out to be buggy. Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Samuel.
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
jeroen@wolffelaar.nl
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
Reply to: