[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: URL convention to point to per-package lintian checks



On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 12:42:31PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> > If you like the email based approach I've mentioned in my former post
> > and point please let me know, I would happy to contribute a patch for
> > that.
> I do, although I'd like to reorganize more than that too.  For example,
> right now everything is written to one giant directory, which isn't a good
> idea.  It would also be nice to have pages by package as well as by
> maintainer, and it would be good to include packages for which one is an
> uploader in one's personal report.

Ok, what do you suggest then? Should I wait for the code reorganization
(assuming it was planned for anytime soon), or go ahead and try patching
something for the meantime?

Cheers.

-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli -*- PhD in Computer Science ............... now what?
zack@{cs.unibo.it,debian.org,bononia.it} -%- http://www.bononia.it/zack/
(15:56:48)  Zack: e la demo dema ?    /\    All one has to do is hit the
(15:57:15)  Bac: no, la demo scema    \/    right keys at the right time

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: