[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#509548: marked as done (qa.debian.org: changes needed in ldap2bugs / bugs.txt generation)

Your message dated Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:08:52 +0000
with message-id <20111101130852.GA12499@master.debian.org>
and subject line qa.debian.org: changes needed in ldap2bugs / bugs.txt generation
has caused the Debian Bug report #509548,
regarding qa.debian.org: changes needed in ldap2bugs / bugs.txt generation
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
509548: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=509548
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal

The scripts should be fixed to cope with "src:foo" as package assignment.

<buxy> dondelelcaro: wishlist, could the BTS refuse package names with ":" in it ?
 example: 504907
 it ends up creation problems further down in automated scripts that rely on the fact that a package name can't have : in et
 in it
<adsb> "src:foo" is somewhat of a special case
 I actually did that reassign on dondelelcaro's advice here last night...
<dondelelcaro> buxy: src:foo is how the BTS is going to encode that a package is actually assigned to the source package foo
<buxy> ok, so that's a new case to deal with
<dondelelcaro> buxy: but yeah, my current development branch has code that disallows most cases of invalid package names
 buxy: that said, anything that is using data from the BTS shouldn't validate the data in the package field
<dondelelcaro> (though feel free to validate data being sent to the BTS)
<buxy> cool, I saw "severity:" and "version:" as package names already :)
<dondelelcaro> yeah; those will all be disallowed
<buxy> I'm not validating anything but http://qa.debian.org/data/ddpo/results/bugs.txt uses : as separator and it breaks when it gets one more unexpected separator
<dondelelcaro> ah
 heh; yeah, : probably isn't a good choice for a separator
 tab or space or something is probably better
 (but probably too late for that now)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.27-1-686-bigmem (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
The script data/ddpo/ldap2bugstxt is no longer used.  The file bugs.txt is now
generated from UDD, see data/cronjobs/ddpo.bug.

Regards,

Bart Martens

--- End Message ---
Reply to: