[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#694009: qa.debian.org: Please include suite version information in RDF meta data



Hi.

Olivier Berger <obergix@debian.org> writes:

>
> Do you know an existing ontology that could be used to link this version
> information to the existing RDF content ?
>
> I'd suggest a Turtle example (see
> http://www-public.telecom-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/weblog/2012/08/29/debian-package-tracking-system-now-produces-rdf-description-of-source-packages/
> for details on how to generate one using rapper) for the sake of readability.
>

I've implemented this feature the following way (example for apache2) :

 <http://www.debian.org/releases/stable#distribution>
    admssw:includedAsset <http://packages.qa.debian.org/apache2#apache2_2.2.16-6+squeeze10> .
  
 <http://www.debian.org/releases/security-stable#distribution>
    admssw:includedAsset <http://packages.qa.debian.org/apache2#apache2_2.2.16-6+squeeze10> .
  
 <http://www.debian.org/releases/testing#distribution>
    admssw:includedAsset <http://packages.qa.debian.org/apache2#apache2_2.2.22-12> .
  
 <http://www.debian.org/releases/unstable#distribution>
    admssw:includedAsset <http://packages.qa.debian.org/apache2#apache2_2.2.22-12> .
  
 <http://www.debian.org/releases/experimental#distribution>
    admssw:includedAsset <http://packages.qa.debian.org/apache2#apache2_2.4.2-2> .


For now, admssw:includedAsset seems the perfect fit according to the
specs, at least :
https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/svn/adms_foss/adms_sw_v1.00/adms_sw_v1.00.htm#Software%20Release%20-%20included%20asset

I hope this will suit most people's needs.

The code is in the SVN, pending deployment.

Hope this helps.

Best regards,
-- 
Olivier BERGER 
http://www-public.telecom-sudparis.eu/~berger_o/ - OpenPGP-Id: 2048R/5819D7E8
Ingenieur Recherche - Dept INF
Institut Mines-Telecom, Telecom SudParis, Evry (France)


Reply to: