Your message dated Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:22:35 +0200 with message-id <201507230922.37529.holger@layer-acht.org> and subject line Re: Bug#785531: please use /reproducible-tracker.json as datasource has caused the Debian Bug report #785531, regarding please use /reproducible-tracker.json as datasource to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 785531: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=785531 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: tracker.d.o: dont show a package as unreproducible and requiring action if its reproducible in sid
- From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Date: Sun, 17 May 2015 15:46:45 +0200
- Message-id: <201505171546.47406.holger@layer-acht.org>
package: tracker.debian.org x-debbugs-cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi, (this is somewhat a followup of #781517.) please don't show a package as unreproducible and requiring action if its reproducible in sid. For example, https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pxz was made reproducible yesterday in sid, so the information that it's unreproducible in testing is pretty meaningless and certainly doesnt require any action from the maintainer. (If a package is fixed in experimental, I'd still display the note though.) (OTOH if a package FTBFS in testing (or any suite), I think this is useful to indicate this now. My point is, to usually ignore testing results except for FTBFS.) Thanks for maintaining tracker.d.o! cheers, HolgerAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 785531-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#785531: please use /reproducible-tracker.json as datasource
- From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:22:35 +0200
- Message-id: <201507230922.37529.holger@layer-acht.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] CAKTje6HOUkyct-Zs7HineHUwioFqVrNAaCaODL-x=Pu9LVfxnw@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <[🔎] 201507101319.41997.holger@layer-acht.org> <[🔎] 201507221522.53896.holger@layer-acht.org> <[🔎] CAKTje6HOUkyct-Zs7HineHUwioFqVrNAaCaODL-x=Pu9LVfxnw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, On Donnerstag, 23. Juli 2015, Paul Wise wrote: > > I'm not sure "we" will ever care about those, as in, I rather envision a > > future where unreproducible packages are not part of testing nor stable… > The problem is that an upload to stable could introduce > unreproducibility and we should catch that. Well, sure, but atm we lack 90% of the architectures Debian provides. So IMO we need to find a solution for those 90% before it makes much sense to think about stable... > I guess a future where the > archive enforces reproducibility is what we want. yeah. > > To say it differently: I'm not sure reproducible-tracker.json will be the > > data source in the future... > > Ok. > > > it does! Now I just wonder whether to reassign this bug to qa.d.o (and > > usertag it jenkins.d.n) or keep it here... (or maybe close and file a > > new one?) > > Lets close and start again. ok, closing. thanks, HolgerAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---