[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1021728: marked as done (tracker.debian.org: Please include the new "non-free-firmware" section)

Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2023 10:44:22 -0600
with message-id <Y8lzZrMPFe9cB9rp@iiec.unam.mx>
and subject line Re: Bug#1021728: tracker.debian.org: Please include the new "non-free-firmware" section
has caused the Debian Bug report #1021728,
regarding tracker.debian.org: Please include the new "non-free-firmware" section
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1021728: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1021728
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hello,

Last week I uploaded raspi-firmware to non-free-firmware (and was
promptly processed through NEW, whee!).

Two days ago, it successfully migrated to Texting.

I am now building the Raspberry Pi images for Bookworm , and
raspi-firmware is correctly downloaded from non-free-firmware.

However, tracker.debian.org misleadingly shows the package as if it
was removed from Debian («package is gone. This package is not in any
development repository. (...)», and no longer lists it for testing and
unstable.

Thank you very much!

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hello Raphael, and sorry for the long time without replying!

Raphael Hertzog dijo [Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 08:45:22PM +0100]:
> Please update me on the official plans... will this section be entirely
> disjoint from non-free? Or will packages from non-free-firmware also
> appear in non-free?

Yes, it's meant to be a completely disjoint section;
firmware-providing packages in non-free should be migrated from
non-free to non-free-firmware

> Will we move all firmwares from non-free in that new section before
> the release of bookworm?

Hopefully! I don't know if we can reach 100% (we don't have that many
firmware packages AFAICT, so there is some hope!), but work is
underway. Please refer to Cyril's message to debian-boot@l.d.o, sent
two days ago:

    https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2023/01/msg00150.html

> In any case, I have tweaked the configuration of tracker.debian.org
> so that it knows (and monitors) that new section in
> bookworm/sid/experimental at this point. Hopefully that should
> be sufficient to fix this initial issue. We will have to monitor this
> for other possible side-effects.

Thanks a lot!

Yes. And I have to push this request to other information providers in
our webpagiverse ;-)

I believe this bug report can now be closed (and am doing so).

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: