Your message dated Sat, 09 Nov 2013 16:19:23 -0300 with message-id <2906265.oZvXmK7OdS@luna> and subject line Problem was corrupted setup has caused the Debian Bug report #729093, regarding qt5-qmake: default.conf not found to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 729093: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=729093 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: qt5-qmake: default.conf not found
- From: Stephen Crowley <scrowley@canaccord.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:05:59 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] f6e1e68e-c9a3-4070-a4df-b782c55942ed@BOS-CAS2.canaccord.com>
Package: qt5-qmake Version: 5.1.1+dfsg-4 Severity: important crow@serenity:~/retroshare$ qmake -makefile qmake: could not open config file '/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/qt-default/qtchooser//default.conf': No such file or directory any ideas? Thanks!! Stephen -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.1 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.10-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages qt5-qmake depends on: ii dpkg 1.16.10 ii libc6 2.17-93 ii libgcc1 1:4.8.1-10 ii libstdc++6 4.7.2-5 ii qtchooser 31-g980c64c-4 qt5-qmake recommends no packages. qt5-qmake suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 729093-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Problem was corrupted setup
- From: Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezmeyer@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2013 16:19:23 -0300
- Message-id: <2906265.oZvXmK7OdS@luna>
So closing :) -- A proprietary undocumented text format as the de facto standard -- and that's what .doc is -- is a shame for all parties involved. It's like using a special patented ink that can only be read with special patented sun glasses. Who would want to use that for all their scientific, private and business documents? Probably nobody. Why they do so with computers is beyond me. Matthias Ettrich, founder of the KDE project. http://www.efytimes.com/efytimes/25412/news.htm Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---