On Wednesday 15 April 2015 18:03:09 martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer <perezmeyer@gmail.com> [2014-03-04 15:58 +0100]: > > Martin: I'm sending the standard reply template for this cases, > > but I'll possibly get to report it upstream myself in some time, > > but I don't know how much time it will take me, as I can only > > reproduce this on $job. > > I assume you didn't have time to do this. You assumption is right :( > I can report this > upstream, but I would really like to know which package is at fault. > Should I file this against okular? Isn't it much more likely that > the problem is deep down in a KDE or Qt library? I saw that you found an already filled bug and moreover upstream seems to know the cause. Now I wonder if this will ever get solved or just left out until okular is ported to qt5 :-/ -- Sólo porque un mensaje pueda no ser recibido no implica que no valga la pena enviarlo. Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.