[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#793026: kde-window-manager: upgrade to 4:5.3.2-2 generates



On Wednesday 05 August 2015 15:36:09 Tsu Jan wrote:
> This is an excerpt from The Debian Administrator's Handbook, section 
> 1.6.3, Migration to Testing:

Do you realize how EXTREMELY condescending just that statement alone is?
And this is just one example which shows how rude (=opposite of polite) your 
remarks are, I could have quoted every single line you've written, because 
they are ALL rude!
Lisandro was kind enough to try to steer you in a direction in which you could 
have made a positive contribution to Debian. You however, failed miserably.

A positive contribution would have been to detail the steps in which you can 
reliably reproduce that program X crashes and preferably also provide a useful 
stacktrace. The 'reportbug' application has a nice template for making a 
positive contribution and it also collects some useful information which would 
help pinpoint that particular problem and thus increase the chances of it 
getting fixed.

Making a completely false assumption that the Debian QT/KDE Maintainers don't 
use the software themselves and extrapolating from there is not helping at all 
and could very well be de-motivating to the people (Debain 
maintainers/developers) who put in a LOT of their *free* time in order for us 
to have/use a great system.

When you use testing, you indicate that you're willing to help 
_constructively_ to make the next STABLE release as good as possible.
You also know that things break from time to time and are willing and capable 
to cope with that. This is even more so in sid/unstable, but it also applies 
to testing.
When you're not willing or capable to do that, use stable.
That testing (and indeed sid also) _appear_ so often just work is due to the 
great work of the various maintainers, but it is in no way a garantee that it 
is always the case. Particular in the _months_ after a new stable release has 
come out, BIG changes happen and thus the chances of things breaking increases 
substantially. 
Again, if you're not willing or capable to deal with that, use stable.

And from now on, I will ignore you because you have annoyed me enough with 
your negative and unconstructive remarks which have done NOTHING to improve 
Debian.
And I'm not even one of the people who have put in a LOT of their FREE time to 
provide users of Debian (testing/sid) with great packages which most of the 
time just work.

PS: I am not a member of the Debian QT/KDE team, so this response is surely 
not on their behalf. I'm just a user who appreciates the great work they do.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: