[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#807361: marked as done (libkf5calendarcore-dev: bad version number in KF5CalendarCoreConfigVersion.cmake)

Your message dated Wed, 16 Dec 2015 22:25:09 +0100
with message-id <5671D6B5.7080407@free.fr>
and subject line The bug is rather in kipi-plugin CMakeList.txt
has caused the Debian Bug report #807361,
regarding libkf5calendarcore-dev: bad version number in KF5CalendarCoreConfigVersion.cmake
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
807361: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807361
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: libkf5calendarcore-dev
Version: 4:15.08.2-1
Severity: important

KF5CalendarCoreConfigVersion.cmake has a version equal to 4.82.0. I just do not
get the numbering sheme and digikam compilation fails because of that.

Why not 15.08.2?

set(PACKAGE_VERSION "4.82.0")

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.1.13 (SMP w/8 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages libkf5calendarcore-dev depends on:
ii  libical-dev                1.0.1-0.1
ii  libkf5calendarcore5        4:15.08.2-1
ii  libkf5kdelibs4support-dev  5.16.0-1

libkf5calendarcore-dev recommends no packages.

libkf5calendarcore-dev suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Sorry for the noise.

-- eric

--- End Message ---
Reply to: