[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1062946: 64-bit time_t transition in progress



Control: tags 1062723 -pending
Control: tags 1062747 -pending
Control: tags 1062749 -pending
Control: tags 1062750 -pending
Control: tags 1062751 -pending
Control: tags 1062758 -pending
Control: tags 1062759 -pending
Control: tags 1062760 -pending
Control: tags 1062762 -pending
Control: tags 1062763 -pending
Control: tags 1062764 -pending
Control: tags 1062766 -pending
Control: tags 1062940 -pending

Hi all,

On Thu, Feb 08, 2024 at 01:06:40PM -0300, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 13:22, Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> wrote:
> >
> > Dear developers,
> >
> > A number of you will have noticed already that the 64-bit time_t transition
> > is now in progress in Debian experimental.
> [snip]
> 
> >    qt6-virtualkeyboard
> >    qt-qml-models
> 
> For all Qt packages, be it Qt 5 or 6, you only need to modify
> libqtXcoreX. The rest of the packages will just follow suite,
> **nothing** in Qt does not depends upon libQtCoreX. In fact I would
> say that by doing that you get even the whole KDE stack in.

Lisandro is right, it is enough to NMU only qtbase. All other Qt submodules
depend on libqtXcoreX, so they just need to be binNMUed to rebuild against
the new version, changing SONAMEs is not needed.

So removing pending tags from Qt modules other than qtbase, to exclude them
from upload list.

--
Dmitry Shachnev

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: