On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 01:48:00PM -0500, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > Anthony Towns claimed on debian-devel that it would take us "a few > months" to prepare boot-floppies for woody. I think it can be done by > Feb. Well, I have no complaints if you get things done earlier, of course :) > I don't think there many major issues. Here's the one's I know > of: > - use busybox.deb from woody rather than the local CVS copy > - dealing with new kernel (what is the proposed kernel for woody, > anyhow?) I'd presume we'd ship with 2.2.x on the boot floppies and as our standard kernel, with 2.4.x kernel images readily available for those that want them (and supported). > I was told by Joey Hess that we still will be needing boot-floppies > for woody. Can that please get confirmed? We either need boot-floppies or debian-installer for woody; and if Joey says debian-installer won't be ready, I can only see one conclusion. So, yes, we're going with b-f's for woody. Is that the confirmation you want? Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``Thanks to all avid pokers out there'' -- linux.conf.au, 17-20 January 2001
Attachment:
pgpvmYYOkttg8.pgp
Description: PGP signature