Re: heimdal
* Russ Allbery [Mon, 04 Aug 2008 21:38:44 -0700]:
> Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es> writes:
> >> * It would be good if I could get somebody to independently verify
> >> that the versioned library symbols really are working (it looks
> >> good to me).
> > Yes, I agree it would be good. I'm CCing Steve Langasek and Russ
> > Allbery; I think they have the required knowledge to do the checking,
> > and hopefully can donate a bit of their time for this. (Many thanks in
> > advance!)
> It looks correct to me for the krb5 interface. It looks like some of the
> internal libraries that Heimdal uses (maybe libroken and libasn1, although
> I'm not sure) aren't using symbol versioning, but since that isn't the API
> that's shared with MIT Kerberos, that shouldn't matter in practice. I
> doubt this is a regression from the previous state; they were probably
> never using symbol versioning.
Ok, thank you; I scheduled the binNMUs now, which are mostly ready now,
and will migrate the new version next.
--
Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Excuse me for thinking a banana-eating contest was about eating a banana!
-- Paris Geller
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: heimdal
- From: Magnus Holmgren <holmgren@debian.org>
- References:
- heimdal
- From: Brian May <bam@snoopy.debian.net>
- Re: heimdal
- From: Adeodato Simó <dato@net.com.org.es>
- Re: heimdal
- From: Russ Allbery <rra@debian.org>