Your message dated Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:06:41 +0200 with message-id <87eipry2da.fsf@pindar.marcbrockschmidt.de> and subject line Re: Bug#548569: nmu: evolution_2.28.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #548569, regarding nmu: evolution_2.28.0-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 548569: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548569 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: nmu: evolution_2.28.0-3
- From: Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:23:54 +0200
- Message-id: <20090927102354.16716.75545.reportbug@hidalgo>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hi, the problem with libdb propagated to evolution, so once eds has been built against a correct libdb, it'd be nice to schedule the same thing for evolution. I guess following should do the trick: nmu evolution_2.28.0-3 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild against an eds linked with db4.8" dw evolution_2.28.0-3 . amd64 . evolution-data-server-dev (>= 2.28.0-2+b1) -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.30-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 548569-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#548569: nmu: evolution_2.28.0-3
- From: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <he@ftwca.de>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 09:06:41 +0200
- Message-id: <87eipry2da.fsf@pindar.marcbrockschmidt.de>
- In-reply-to: <20090927102354.16716.75545.reportbug@hidalgo> (Yves-Alexis Perez's message of "Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:23:54 +0200")
- References: <20090927102354.16716.75545.reportbug@hidalgo>
Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org> writes: > the problem with libdb propagated to evolution, so once eds has been built > against a correct libdb, it'd be nice to schedule the same thing for > evolution. > I guess following should do the trick: > > nmu evolution_2.28.0-3 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild against an eds linked with db4.8" > dw evolution_2.28.0-3 . amd64 . evolution-data-server-dev (>= 2.28.0-2+b1) Done. Both the version numbers and the dw format were wrong, BTW. How did you generate them? Marc -- BOFH #250: Program load too heavy for processor to lift.Attachment: pgpV3PXAyirgO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---