Re: Bug#558412: binutils-dev: Please provide libbfd_pic.a
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 07:57:51 +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
> Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
> > This did not seem to get any attention on debian-devel, so I am cross
> > posting to debian-release. I would really be interested to know if
> > others think that the binNMU approach suggested by Matthias is
> > acceptable and/or viable.
>
> Unless it's an option to include oprofile into binutils source package,
> I don't see what's wrong with the binNMU approach?
>
That would probably work if binutils had a sane shlibs file. Currently
it allows linking against libbfd and generates bogus unversioned
dependency on binutils.
Cheers,
Julien
Reply to: