[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#638464: marked as done (RM: deps/0.13-1.1)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:04:46 +0200
with message-id <20110820090446.GF2820@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr>
and subject line Re: Bug#638463: RM: tulip/3.1.2-2.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #638464,
regarding RM: deps/0.13-1.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
638464: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638464
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

Please remove deps from testing. It is the only package (libdeps-renderer-
tulip-perl) which has a dependency on tulip and therefore also prevents the 
transition of glew.

It has a low popcount (~60) and no rdeps. This was also the reason why it was 
removed in 2008 from testing 
http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/deps/news/20080904T163917Z.html

It seems that it is a possible solution because it was suggested by Phillipp 
Kern.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 15:24:25 +0200, Clara Gnos wrote:

> Please remove tulip from testing. Around a half year, different RC bugs 
> (FTBFS; #556508, #615687, #616282, #638169) are open and nothing seems to be 
> happen there. It is also heavily outdated.
> 

On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 15:24:27 +0200, Clara Gnos wrote:

> Please remove deps from testing. It is the only package (libdeps-renderer-
> tulip-perl) which has a dependency on tulip and therefore also prevents the 
> transition of glew.
> 
Removal hint added.

Cheers,
Julien

--- End Message ---
Reply to: