Bug#683243: unblock: keystone/2012.1.1-2
On 08/09/2012 02:40 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Julien Cristau (jcristau@debian.org):
>> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 13:19:57 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: unblock
>>>
>>> Dear Release Team,
>>>
>>> The new Keystone package, currently available in SID, contains
>>> reviewed Debconf templates and lots of translations, thanks to
>>> the work of Bubulle.
>>>
>>> Please unblock keystone/2012.1.1-2.
>>>
>> 2012.1.1-1 to 2012.1.1-3 has a change to
>> debian/docs/scripts/keystone.base-deployment.sh that doesn't seem to be
>> mentioned in the changelog. Why, and what does it do?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Julien
>
> Thomas, it seems that you forgot to answer this question from
> Julien....which, in turn, leaves the unblock request unadressed. Any
> chance that you can do so?
I didn't forget. That's because we are still waiting for new debconf
translations from you (eg: the template that went away in 2012.1.1-2),
so I didn't think it was needed to bother the release team until this is
fixed.
By the way, let me reply this: I uploaded whatever was in the Git, and I
wasn't aware of this change. This has been changed by Ghe Rivero, with
the following comment in the Git:
"Small fixes in keystone.base-deployment.sh"
This file, by the way, is from debian/docs (and later packaged in
/usr/share/doc/keystone/scripts), so this can be considered a a
documentation update with very little consequence. I regret that this
hasn't been documented in debian/changelog, but this hasn't done by me.
If I understand well, this file is a script to create keystone roles in
order to later administer Openstack (eg: creating the necessary auth
user for nova and glance). I don't think we should worry too much about
it (it's only an example script...).
By the way, git blame shows that this file has been written fully by Ghe
Rivero, who is currently in holidays. Maybe he will be able to reply
what his change is about later on (eg: what it fixes).
Thomas
Reply to: