Your message dated Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:42:18 +0200 with message-id <54458FCA.9040606@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#748169: transition: wxwidgets3.0 has caused the Debian Bug report #748169, regarding transition: wxwidgets3.0 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 748169: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748169 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: wxwidgets3.0
- From: Olly Betts <olly@survex.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 13:07:11 +1200
- Message-id: <20140515010711.GA1521@gemse>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition It would be good if we could eliminate wxwidgets2.8 from the archive for jessie - the last upstream release (2.8.12) was over 3 years ago, and there's very little upstream interest in bugs in it now. We've had co-installable packages of wxwidgets3.0 for 6 months and they seem to work well. I've been working on doing test builds and filing bugs with any patches required, tracking progress on the wiki: https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/WxWidgets/Transition2.8to3.0 But manually tracking packages is somewhat error prone, and in particular misses people adding new dependencies on wx2.8, so I'd like to make use of the transition tracker to automatically track which packages still need attention. This transition probably doesn't need allocating a "slot" to happen at this point, since packages can mostly be updated to use wxwidgets3.0 independently of one another. There's a (possibly incomplete) list of affected packages on the wiki page above. Also, everything using wxpython will need an update before we can actually remove wxwidgets2.8, but I've been focusing on the C++ packages so far, and haven't yet uploaded packages of wxpython3 (my current plan is to do that after the next upstream point release). Ben file: title = "wxwidgets3.0"; is_affected = .build-depends ~ /libwx(base|gtk(-media)?)3\.0-dev|wx3\.0-(headers|i18n)/ | .build-depends ~ /libwx(base|gtk(-media)?)2\.8-dev|wx2\.8-(headers|i18n)/; is_good = .build-depends ~ /libwx(base|gtk(-media)?)3\.0-dev|wx3\.0-(headers|i18n)/; is_bad = .build-depends ~ /libwx(base|gtk(-media)?)2\.8-dev|wx2\.8-(headers|i18n)/; Cheers, OllyAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Olly Betts <olly@survex.com>, 748169-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#748169: transition: wxwidgets3.0
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:42:18 +0200
- Message-id: <54458FCA.9040606@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <20140515010711.GA1521@gemse>
- References: <20140515010711.GA1521@gemse>
On 15/05/14 03:07, Olly Betts wrote:Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition It would be good if we could eliminate wxwidgets2.8 from the archive for jessie - the last upstream release (2.8.12) was over 3 years ago, and there's very little upstream interest in bugs in it now.This just happened, wxwidgets2.8 is no longer in testing.You'll eventually want to open a removal bug against ftp.debian.org if you haven't done so, but first any remaining rdeps in unstable will need to be removed or fixed. But from a RT POV, this is now over, so I'm closing this report.Emilio
--- End Message ---