[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#784724: marked as done (transition: gloox)

Your message dated Thu, 14 May 2015 09:16:14 +0100
with message-id <d856a16bc2d2cfd0c29cf1b5e1f1b8a5@hogwarts.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#784724: transition: gloox
has caused the Debian Bug report #784724,
regarding transition: gloox
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
784724: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784724
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a relatively small
transition, with only 4 source packages affected (tested builds against newer
gloox, currently in experimental, results are as follows):

licq (build ok, needs binNMU)
0ad (build ok, needs binNMU)
uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU)
fatrat (NOT in testing, removed due to boost-related FTBFS - #713663)

Ben file:

title = "gloox";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libgloox12" | .depends ~ "libgloox13";
is_good = .depends ~ "libgloox13";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libgloox12";

Regards,
Vincent

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (700, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (200, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.18-3-vclaptop-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2015-05-09 09:18, Vincent Cheng wrote:
On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 1:22 AM, Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org> wrote: 
Control: tag -1 confirmed

On 2015-05-08 04:16, Vincent Cheng wrote:
I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a relatively 
small
transition, with only 4 source packages affected (tested builds against 
newer
gloox, currently in experimental, results are as follows):

licq (build ok, needs binNMU)
0ad (build ok, needs binNMU)
uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU)
fatrat (NOT in testing, removed due to boost-related FTBFS - #713663)



Please go ahead.


Uploaded to sid and now built on all archs. Thanks in advance for
scheduling binNMUs!



The transition completed last night.

--
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
            8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
			layered on top of bonghits

--- End Message ---
Reply to: