[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#800509: marked as done (transition: llvm-toolchain-3.6)

Your message dated Fri, 22 Jul 2016 16:47:07 +0200
with message-id <18ad572b-abc0-e72b-03d3-4c50c360691b@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#800509: LLVM default to 3.6 transition ?
has caused the Debian Bug report #800509,
regarding transition: llvm-toolchain-3.6
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
800509: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800509
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-debbugs-cc: sylvestre@debian.org

On 30/09/15 09:52, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Le 11/08/2015 11:10, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
>> Hello,
>>
>> I am planning to update llvm-default to LLVM & Clang 3.6. The changes have been in exp for a while.
>> However, I would like to know what is best from the release team POV:
>>
> Can we start this transition?

I have been going through transition requests but I have missed this because
there isn't a bug report. Opening one now.

> FYI, LLVM 3.7 has been released.
> The safe way would be to do 3.5 => 3.6 now and 3.6 => 3.7 once 3.7.1 is
> released (in one or two months)
> or the fun way would be to skip 3.6 in the transition.
> I would prefer the first option but I don't mind if you prefer to avoid
> a transition.

Going through 3.6 first is fine. Have you done a test rebuild for the rdeps? I
have created a tracker, does it look good?

https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/llvm-defaults-3.6.html

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 30/09/15 11:38, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-debbugs-cc: sylvestre@debian.org
> 
> On 30/09/15 09:52, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Le 11/08/2015 11:10, Sylvestre Ledru a écrit :
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I am planning to update llvm-default to LLVM & Clang 3.6. The changes have been in exp for a while.
>>> However, I would like to know what is best from the release team POV:
>>>
>> Can we start this transition?
> 
> I have been going through transition requests but I have missed this because
> there isn't a bug report. Opening one now.

The only remaining package still using llvm 3.5 is ghc. But let's track this in
the 3.8 transition bug, #832098.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: