Bug#849004: jessie-pu: package evolution-data-server/3.12.9~git20141128.5242b0-2+deb8u2
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2016-12-21 at 18:45 +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> I'd like to see an update for #787398 in jessie, as a customer of mine has
> hit this bug, and it's a particularly nasty one.
>
> proposed debdiff:
>
> diff -Nru evolution-data-server-3.12.9~git20141128.5242b0/debian/changelog evolution-data-server-3.12.9~git20141128.5242b0/debian/changelog
> --- evolution-data-server-3.12.9~git20141128.5242b0/debian/changelog 2015-03-25 12:16:25.000000000 +0100
> +++ evolution-data-server-3.12.9~git20141128.5242b0/debian/changelog 2016-12-21 18:31:01.000000000 +0100
> @@ -1,3 +1,13 @@
> +evolution-data-server (3.12.9~git20141128.5242b0-2+deb8u2.1) jessie; urgency=medium
3.12.9~git20141128.5242b0-2+deb8u3, please. The part after the "u" is a
strictly increasing integer indicating the number of uploads to the
relevant Debian release.
[...]
> * d/p/05_imapx-Shared-folders-removed-folder-list-refresh.patch: Fix shared
> diff -Nru evolution-data-server-3.12.9~git20141128.5242b0/debian/patches/06_787398_bae0c64_fix_connection_drop.patch evolution-data-server-3.12.9~git20141128.5242b0/debian/patches/06_787398_bae0c64_fix_connection_drop.patch
> --- evolution-data-server-3.12.9~git20141128.5242b0/debian/patches/06_787398_bae0c64_fix_connection_drop.patch 1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
> +++ evolution-data-server-3.12.9~git20141128.5242b0/debian/patches/06_787398_bae0c64_fix_connection_drop.patch 2016-12-21 18:31:01.000000000 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
> +Description: Make camel_stream_write() try to write all bytes at once
> + The default implementation of CamelStream::write() used
[...]
> + evolution-data-server (3.12.9~git20141128.5242b0-2+deb8u2) unstable; urgency=medium
> + .
> + * d/p/05_imapx-Shared-folders-removed-folder-list-refresh.patch: Fix shared
> + IMAP folders disappearing in some situations.
I'm assuming those latter few lines aren't meant to be in the patch
header?
With the above notes in mind, please go ahead.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: