[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#900334: marked as done (transition: gloox)

Your message dated Thu, 7 Jun 2018 22:06:04 -0700
with message-id <CACZd_tBqF9g2_JnSzJK3_v67RY5ip6Lc6_nadAuR=4pAdkSv-w@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#900334: transition: gloox
has caused the Debian Bug report #900334,
regarding transition: gloox
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
900334: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=900334
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Severity: normal

Hi,

I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a
relatively small transition, with only 2 source packages affected
(tested builds against newer gloox, currently in experimental, results
are as follows):

0ad (build ok, needs binNMU)
uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU)

Ben file:

(https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gloox.html is accurate)

Regards,
Vincent

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 9:47 AM, Vincent Cheng <vcheng@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi Emilio,
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 2:41 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
> <pochu@debian.org> wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 29/05/18 11:00, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> On 29/05/18 10:49, Vincent Cheng wrote:
>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>>>> Usertags: transition
>>>> Severity: normal
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'd like to request a transition slot for src:gloox. This is a
>>>> relatively small transition, with only 2 source packages affected
>>>> (tested builds against newer gloox, currently in experimental, results
>>>> are as follows):
>>>>
>>>> 0ad (build ok, needs binNMU)
>>>> uwsgi (build ok, needs binNMU)
>>>
>>> Let's wait for the curl transition to finish.
>>
>> curl has migrated to testing today. Go ahead.
>
> I've uploaded gloox to sid and have confirmed that it's built on all
> release archs. Please go ahead and schedule binNMUs, thanks!

gloox has since migrated to testing, so closing this bug.

Regards,
Vincent

--- End Message ---
Reply to: