[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#872642: marked as done (stretch-pu: package hdf5/1.10.0-patch1+docs-3)

Your message dated Fri, 08 Jun 2018 21:49:52 +0100
with message-id <1528490992.2075.63.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#872642: stretch-pu: package hdf5/1.10.0-patch1+docs-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #872642,
regarding stretch-pu: package hdf5/1.10.0-patch1+docs-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
872642: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=872642
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

HDF5 in stretch is affected by RC bug #871506 now fixed in unstable and
testing.
I have prepared release 1.10.0-patch1+docs-3+deb9u1 for stretch with the
very same fix as in unstable. Debdiff attached.
I'd appreciate if you consider allowing this upload to stretch.
Thanks in advance,

_g.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: buster/sid
  APT prefers testing-debug
  APT policy: (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

diff -Nru hdf5-1.10.0-patch1+docs/debian/changelog hdf5-1.10.0-patch1+docs/debian/changelog
--- hdf5-1.10.0-patch1+docs/debian/changelog	2016-12-05 09:27:39.000000000 +0100
+++ hdf5-1.10.0-patch1+docs/debian/changelog	2017-08-19 09:33:00.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+hdf5 (1.10.0-patch1+docs-3+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium
+
+  * debian/rules: fix javahelper invocation (closes: #871506)
+
+ -- Gilles Filippini <pini@debian.org>  Sat, 19 Aug 2017 09:33:00 +0200
+
 hdf5 (1.10.0-patch1+docs-3) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Enable openmpi flavor on hppa (closes: #833457)
diff -Nru hdf5-1.10.0-patch1+docs/debian/rules hdf5-1.10.0-patch1+docs/debian/rules
--- hdf5-1.10.0-patch1+docs/debian/rules	2016-12-05 09:27:39.000000000 +0100
+++ hdf5-1.10.0-patch1+docs/debian/rules	2017-08-18 13:01:20.000000000 +0200
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
 # No java >= 1.7 on hppa and hurd-i386
 ifeq (,$(filter $(DEB_HOST_ARCH),hppa hurd-i386))
 SERIAL_FLAGS += --enable-java
-DH_HELPERS = --with-javahelper
+DH_HELPERS = --with javahelper
 install_jni := install_jni
 dh_install_java := dh_install_java
 PACKAGES_java := libhdf5-java libhdf5-jni

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Fri, 2018-03-02 at 22:38 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags 1 + pending
> 
> On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 22:27 +0100, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> > Adam D. Barratt a écrit le 27/02/2018 à 20:57 :
> > > On Tue, 2018-02-27 at 20:53 +0100, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > > > On Sun, 27 Aug 2017 14:03:38 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt"
> > > > <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
> > > > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Sat, 2017-08-19 at 19:20 +0200, Gilles Filippini wrote:
> > > > > > HDF5 in stretch is affected by RC bug #871506 now fixed in
> > > > > > unstable and
> > > > > > testing.
> > > > > > I have prepared release 1.10.0-patch1+docs-3+deb9u1 for
> > > > > > stretch
> > > > > > with the
> > > > > > very same fix as in unstable. Debdiff attached.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Please go ahead.
> > > > 
> > > > I've just got reminded this pending upload request I had
> > > > completely
> > > > forgotten about, because I missed the 'go' which occurred
> > > > during
> > > > my
> > > > holidays.
> > > > Since it is 6 months old now, could you please confirm that the
> > > > 'go'
> > > > is
> > > > still granted?
> > > 
> > > Sure.
> > 
> > Done.
> > 
> 
> Flagged for acceptance into p-u.
> 

This bug was unfortunately missed when cleaning up the lists of
released updates previously.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: