[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#879544: marked as done (transition: netcdf)



Your message dated Fri, 19 Jul 2019 18:18:45 +0200
with message-id <491968df-00f5-daf1-d033-dd4e90fb7442@xs4all.nl>
and subject line Completed transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #879544,
regarding transition: netcdf
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
879544: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=879544
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: block -1 by 878818
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-netcdf.html

NetCDF 4.5.0 has been released and bumps the SOVERSION to 13 requiring a
transition.

The release candidates have been available in experimental for a while
and the final release is there now. It built successfully on all release
architectures, and also on hurd & kfreebsd after a fix to the symbols
file.

Only a single package failed to build, and not due to the changes in netcdf:

 ovito (2.9.0+dfsg1-2) FTBFS due to an unrelated issue: #878818

All other reverse dependencies rebuild successfully. Details of the
rebuilds are included below.

The automatically generated transition tracker is sufficient, the
suggested ben file is included for completeness.


Ben file:

title = "netcdf";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libnetcdf11" | .depends ~ "libnetcdf13";
is_good = .depends ~ "libnetcdf13";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libnetcdf11";


Transition: netcdf

 libnetcdf11 (1:4.4.1.1-2) -> libnetcdf13 (1:4.5.0-1~exp1)

The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows.

 adios              (1.12.0-4)            OK
 cmor               (3.2.7-2)             OK
 dx                 (1:4.4.4-10)          OK
 eccodes            (2.5.0-2)             OK
 exodusii           (6.02.dfsg.1-8)       OK
 ffmpeg             (7:3.3.4-2)           OK
 gdal               (2.2.2+dfsg-2)        OK
 grace              (1:5.1.25-5)          OK
 grads              (3:2.1.1.b0-1)        OK
 gri                (2.12.26-1)           OK
 grib-api           (1.24.0-2)            OK
 labplot            (2.4.0-1)             OK
 libminc            (2.3.00-3.1)          OK
 libpdl-netcdf-perl (4.20-5)              OK
 nco                (4.6.9-1)             OK
 ncview             (2.1.8+ds-1)          OK
 netcdf-cxx         (4.3.0+ds-4)          OK
 netcdf-cxx-legacy  (4.2-7)               OK
 netcdf-fortran     (4.4.4+ds-2)          OK
 netcdf4-python     (1.3.0-1)             OK
 octave-netcdf      (1.0.11-1)            OK
 r-cran-ncdf4       (1.16-1)              OK
 r-cran-rnetcdf     (1.8-2-1)             OK
 ruby-netcdf        (0.7.2-1)             OK
 v-sim              (3.7.2-4)             OK

 cdftools           (3.0-2~exp1.1)        OK
 etsf-io            (1.0.4-1.1)           OK
 ferret-vis         (7.2-1)               OK
 gmt                (5.4.2+dfsg-1)        OK
 gnudatalanguage    (0.9.7-4)             OK
 grass              (7.2.2-1)             OK
 magics++           (2.34.3-2)            OK
 minc-tools         (2.3.00+dfsg-1.1)     OK
 ncl                (6.4.0-4)             OK
 oasis3             (3.mct+dfsg.121022-9) OK
 ovito              (2.9.0+dfsg1-2)       FTBFS (#878818)
 paraview           (5.4.1+dfsg3-1)       OK
 python-escript     (5.0-4)               OK
 vtk6               (6.3.0+dfsg1-10)      OK

 cdo                (1.9.1+dfsg.1-1)      OK
 ifrit              (4.1.2-5)             OK
 metview            (4.8.7-2)             OK
 pyferret           (7.2-1)               OK


Kind Regards,

Bas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This transition was completed quite a while ago.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: