Bug#973480: transition: llvm-defaults

[Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>]

On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 04:36:06PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2020 at 03:18:52PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >...
> > I'm not sure what .depends ~ "~" is supposed to catch here and it causes
> > a parser failure. So I've merged this ben file with the one from the
> > llvm-defaults 9 transition. Once the tracker is available, please check
> > if that looks sane.
> 
> Please remove the second part from the Affected, these packages are not 
> part of the llvm-defaults transition.

I've rebuilt the 13 bad packages from the ben file below:
ccls OK
clazy OK
codelite OK
faust OK
ghdl FTBFS #976233
ldc OK
libclang-perl OK
qttools-opensource-src OK
sparse OK
ycmd OK
kdevelop OK
qtcreator OK
gnome-builder OK

This is not a normal transition where old package(s) disappear from 
testing since both LLVM 9 and LLVM 11 are already in testing and will 
stay in testing after this transition.

This means rebuilds could be scheduled at any time after an 
llvm-defaults upload without actual conflict with other transitions.

Removal of LLVM 9 and/or LLVM 10 from bullseye are topics unrelated
to this llvm-defaults transition.

cu
Adrian


title = "llvm-defaults 11";
is_affected = .build-depends ~ /\b(libclang|liblldb|llvm)-dev\b/;
is_good = .depends ~ /\b(lib|)(clang|lldb|llvm)1?-?11\b/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /\b(lib|)(clang|lldb|llvm)1?-?9\b/;