Your message dated Thu, 7 Jan 2021 12:11:50 +0100 with message-id <X/bsdpwhuCAqGb6U@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#977972: transition: ppp has caused the Debian Bug report #977972, regarding transition: ppp to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 977972: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977972 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: ppp
- From: Chris Boot <bootc@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 15:03:06 +0000
- Message-id: <160873578619.144013.6312122565390613905.reportbug@tarquin.boo.tc>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi release team folks, There has been a version of ppp in experimental since 2020-02-15. I've got a very slightly revised version that I'd like to upload over the holidays (mostly just cosmetic packaging updates) but I'll wait to upload until I hear from you. This new version is an ABI break due to the new upstream version, hence the transition. As usual this isn't a traditional library package upload so the Ben file looks a bit foreign. See #890204 for the (only) other time we did this. Best regards, Chris Ben file: title = "ppp"; is_affected = .build-depends ~ /ppp-dev/; is_good = .depends ~ /ppp \(>= 2\.4\.8-1\+~\)/ | .breaks ~ /ppp \(<< 2\.4\.8-1\+~\)/; is_bad = .depends ~ /ppp \(>= 2\.4\.7-2\+~\)/ | .breaks ~ /ppp \(<< 2\.4\.7-2\+~\)/;
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Chris Boot <bootc@debian.org>, 977972-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#977972: transition: ppp
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2021 12:11:50 +0100
- Message-id: <X/bsdpwhuCAqGb6U@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <160873578619.144013.6312122565390613905.reportbug@tarquin.boo.tc>
- References: <160873578619.144013.6312122565390613905.reportbug@tarquin.boo.tc>
On 2020-12-23 15:03:06 +0000, Chris Boot wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi release team folks, > > There has been a version of ppp in experimental since 2020-02-15. I've > got a very slightly revised version that I'd like to upload over the > holidays (mostly just cosmetic packaging updates) but I'll wait to > upload until I hear from you. This new version is an ABI break due to > the new upstream version, hence the transition. > > As usual this isn't a traditional library package upload so the Ben file > looks a bit foreign. See #890204 for the (only) other time we did this. ppp 2.4.8 migrated to testing. So let's close this bug and contine with ppp 2.4.9 in #979303. Cheers > > Best regards, > Chris > > Ben file: > > title = "ppp"; > is_affected = .build-depends ~ /ppp-dev/; > is_good = .depends ~ /ppp \(>= 2\.4\.8-1\+~\)/ | .breaks ~ /ppp \(<< 2\.4\.8-1\+~\)/; > is_bad = .depends ~ /ppp \(>= 2\.4\.7-2\+~\)/ | .breaks ~ /ppp \(<< 2\.4\.7-2\+~\)/; > -- Sebastian RamacherAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---