[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: uncoordinated box2d transition (was: Re: Accepted box2d 2.4.1-2 (source) into unstable)



Hi,

Am 05.09.21 um 09:48 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> caveexpress is the only other affected package - and (expectedly)
> doesn't build anymore:
> 
> [...]
> 
> [20%] Building CXX object
> src/modules/physics/CMakeFiles/physics.dir/DebugRenderer.cpp.o
> cd
> /home/rene/LibreOffice/git/master/caveexpress-2.5.1/obj-i686-linux-gnu/src/modules/physics
> && /usr/bin/ccache /usr/bin/c++ -DHAVE_LUA_H
> -DPKGDATADIR=\"/usr/share/games\"
> -I/home/rene/LibreOffice/git/master/caveexpress-2.5.1/obj-i686-linux-gnu
> -I/home/rene/LibreOffice/git/master/caveexpress-2.5.1/src
> -I/home/rene/LibreOffice/git/master/caveexpress-2.5.1/src/modules
> -I/usr/include/SDL2 -I/usr/include/lua5.2 -I/usr/include/box2d -g -O2
> -ffile-prefix-map=/home/rene/LibreOffice/git/master/caveexpress-2.5.1=.
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -std=c++11 -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -g -O2
> -ffile-prefix-map=/home/rene/LibreOffice/git/master/caveexpress-2.5.1=.
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -Wdate-time
> -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -g -Wcast-qual -Wcast-align -Wpointer-arith
> -Wno-long-long -Wno-multichar -Wshadow -Wall -Wextra -Wno-sign-compare
> -Wno-unused-parameter -Wreturn-type -Wwrite-strings -Wno-variadic-macros
> -Wno-unknown-pragmas -pthread -Wnon-virtual-dtor -o
> CMakeFiles/physics.dir/DebugRenderer.cpp.o -c
> /home/rene/LibreOffice/git/master/caveexpress-2.5.1/src/modules/physics/DebugRenderer.cpp
> In file included from
> /home/rene/LibreOffice/git/master/caveexpress-2.5.1/src/modules/physics/DebugRenderer.cpp:1:
> /home/rene/LibreOffice/git/master/caveexpress-2.5.1/src/modules/physics/DebugRenderer.h:7:10:
> fatal error: Box2D/Box2D.h: No such file or directory
>     7 | #include <Box2D/Box2D.h>
>       |          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> compilation terminated.
> 
> [...]
> 

This is #993710 now.

Regards,

Rene


Reply to: