Bug#992563: transition: gdal
On 2021-09-23 11:40:15, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-09-23 11:34:21, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> > On 9/18/21 9:57 AM, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > On 2021-09-18 07:01:38 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> > >> On 9/12/21 7:54 PM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Quite a few packages on mipsel may need a binNMU for the recent glibc
> > >> changes, it allowed libgdal-grass to migrate, but there a still quite a
> > >> few packages with remaining issues:
> > >>
> > >> https://linuxminded.nl/debian/gis-transitions/testing/html/gdal.html
> > >
> > > There are a over 200 packages and a bunch of binNMUs that are blocked by
> > > glibc. I'm slowly wading through that list.
> >
> > glibc migrated to testing, this allowed a few packages that are part of
> > the gdal & pdal transitions to migrate but there are still outstanding
> > issues.
> >
> > In the britney update_output.txt you see these packages as reasons why
> > the old gdal & pdal library cannot be removed, but you don't see
> > attempts to migrate those packages.
> >
> > r-cran-rgdal and r-cran-sf are blocked by r-base.
>
> They have been binNMUed in testing-proposed-updates and should migrate
> to testing in the next run.
>
> >
> > What is preventing vtk7 and paraview from migrating?
>
> From https://release.debian.org/britney/update_excuses.html: both the
> paraview and vtk7 binNMUs are blocked by openmpi.
A fix for gyoto was uploaded, so openmpi should be able to migrate in a
few days.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: