[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1016724: marked as done (transition: libwebsockets)



Your message dated Mon, 15 Aug 2022 13:30:10 +0200
with message-id <YvouQrcD2iVR7XXg@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1016724: transition: libwebsockets
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016724,
regarding transition: libwebsockets
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1016724: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016724
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi RMs,

Long overdue transition of libwebsockets. Its dependencies with two
notes compiles well with the new 4.1.6 version from experimental as
well.
Note 1 is that forked-daapd is not tried, already FTBFS due to other
reasons and already Sid only due to that.
Note 2: For the first time the _self testing_ of swupdate failed to
build with parallelity of -j12. The linker couldn't find its symbols.
With -j1 and next -j12 setting, it built fine.

Thanks in advance,
Laszlo/GCS

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2022-08-06 12:57:56, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On 2022-08-06 09:22:51, László Böszörményi wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > 
> > Hi RMs,
> > 
> > Long overdue transition of libwebsockets. Its dependencies with two
> > notes compiles well with the new 4.1.6 version from experimental as
> > well.
> > Note 1 is that forked-daapd is not tried, already FTBFS due to other
> > reasons and already Sid only due to that.
> > Note 2: For the first time the _self testing_ of swupdate failed to
> > build with parallelity of -j12. The linker couldn't find its symbols.
> > With -j1 and next -j12 setting, it built fine.
> 
> Please go ahead

The old binaries got removed.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---

Reply to: