[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1016871: marked as done (transition: dpdk)

Your message dated Sun, 28 Aug 2022 17:19:13 +0200
with message-id <YwuHcQSfRhqDDPY0@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1016871: transition: dpdk
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016871,
regarding transition: dpdk
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1016871: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016871
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-CC: zigo@debian.org bottoms@debian.org team+collectd@tracker.debian.org pkg-dpdk-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org

Dear Release Team,

The new DPDK 21.11 LTS is ready for unstable/testing, and we wish to
begin the transition. It was already uploaded to experimental:

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dpdk

The reverse dependencies are collectd, uhd and openvswitch:

https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/collectd
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/uhd
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openvswitch

src:collectd currently suffers from an unrelated FTBFS:

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016187

With a local workaround for that, it builds fine with the new src:dpdk,
so I don't think it should block the transition.

src:uhd rebuilds without any changes. 

src:openvswitch needs a new version, and thus its reverse dep src:ovn
needs one too, which we already uploaded to experimental and are ready
for unstable.

Auto-transition page:

https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-dpdk.html

Thank you!

-- 
Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2022-08-15 13:48:46 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-dpdk.html
> 
> On 2022-08-08 16:19:03, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > X-Debbugs-CC: zigo@debian.org bottoms@debian.org team+collectd@tracker.debian.org pkg-dpdk-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org
> > 
> > Dear Release Team,
> > 
> > The new DPDK 21.11 LTS is ready for unstable/testing, and we wish to
> > begin the transition. It was already uploaded to experimental:
> > 
> > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dpdk
> > 
> > The reverse dependencies are collectd, uhd and openvswitch:
> > 
> > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/collectd
> > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/uhd
> > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/openvswitch
> > 
> > src:collectd currently suffers from an unrelated FTBFS:
> > 
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016187
> > 
> > With a local workaround for that, it builds fine with the new src:dpdk,
> > so I don't think it should block the transition.
> > 
> > src:uhd rebuilds without any changes. 
> > 
> > src:openvswitch needs a new version, and thus its reverse dep src:ovn
> > needs one too, which we already uploaded to experimental and are ready
> > for unstable.
> 
> Please go ahead

The old binaries got removed. Closing. 

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
Reply to: