Bug#994540: transition: imagemagick
- To: Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues <josch@debian.org>, 994540@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#994540: transition: imagemagick
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2022 15:59:44 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] YxNd0La4Iy4bloHb@ramacher.at>
- Reply-to: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>, 994540@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <165788660478.2702895.10976455045908402238@localhost>
- References: <163188309778.522327.10496486166717943696.reportbug@portable-bastien.local.roucaries.eu> <163290468712.1234887.3602862026082468144@localhost> <Ys8wpJ2Rc4U+71Nd@ramacher.at> <163188309778.522327.10496486166717943696.reportbug@portable-bastien.local.roucaries.eu> <165788660478.2702895.10976455045908402238@localhost> <163188309778.522327.10496486166717943696.reportbug@portable-bastien.local.roucaries.eu>
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2022-07-15 14:03:24 +0200, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> Quoting Sebastian Ramacher (2022-07-13 22:52:52)
> > On 2021-09-29 10:38:07 +0200, josch@mister-muffin.de wrote:
> > > > Do all reverse dependencies build fine with the new Imagemagick version?
> > > > If not, have bugs been filed?
> > >
> > > I have rebuilt all 399 source packages that have at least one binary produced
> > > by src:imagemagick in their build dependency installation closure. Of those, 16
> > > packages FTBFS with the imagemagick version form experimental but succeed with
> > > the version from unstable. Of those, only one package (src:wand) is in the list
> > > from https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-imagemagick.html I filed
> > > this failure as #995290 and will investigate the other 15 instances as well.
> > > But since those source packages are not part of the transition, they should
> > > probably not block this bug.
> >
> > This transition completly dropped off my radar, sorry!
> >
> > What's the current status of the preparations? Have the bugs been filed?
>
> we had one build failure in src:wand which I fixed in imagemagick upload of
> 8:6.9.12.20+dfsg1-1.2 to experimental. See also #995290
Please go ahead
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: