Bug#1024893: marked as done (transition: libcifpp)
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2023 11:29:42 +0100
with message-id <Y70+FgdxQsI/XkNg@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1024893: libcifpp: Requesting transition slot
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024893,
regarding transition: libcifpp
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1024893: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024893
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: libcifpp: Requesting transition slot
- From: "Maarten L. Hekkelman" <maarten@hekkelman.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2022 16:37:34 +0100
- Message-id: <166956345419.328993.6775647646836317396.reportbug@s4.hekkelman.net>
Source: libcifpp
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
libcifpp and libpdb-redo are both in experimental. I've prepared the
packages depending on them and am now requesting a time slot to take
the following transition steps.
regards,
-maarten hekkelman
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: "Maarten L. Hekkelman" <maarten@hekkelman.com>, 1024893-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1024893: libcifpp: Requesting transition slot
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2023 11:29:42 +0100
- Message-id: <Y70+FgdxQsI/XkNg@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <Y7AEK918n3ALXz4p@ramacher.at>
- References: <166956345419.328993.6775647646836317396.reportbug@s4.hekkelman.net> <166956345419.328993.6775647646836317396.reportbug@s4.hekkelman.net> <Y6wi+be5oqMcTUnZ@ramacher.at> <166956345419.328993.6775647646836317396.reportbug@s4.hekkelman.net> <Y7AEK918n3ALXz4p@ramacher.at>
On 2022-12-31 10:43:07 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2022-12-28 12:05:29 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> >
> > Hi Maarten
> >
> > On 2022-11-27 16:37:34 +0100, Maarten L. Hekkelman wrote:
> > > Source: libcifpp
> > > Severity: normal
> > >
> > > Dear Maintainer,
> > >
> > > libcifpp and libpdb-redo are both in experimental. I've prepared the
> > > packages depending on them and am now requesting a time slot to take
> > > the following transition steps.
> >
> > Assuming that the test builds against the new versions were successful,
> > please go ahead.
>
> They were not: #1027425, #1027426.
The old binaries got removed from testing. Closing.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: