Bug#1027746: marked as done (transition: log4cxx)
Your message dated Tue, 10 Jan 2023 23:23:28 +0100
with message-id <Y73lYJGpR9GY7HIY@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1027746: transition: log4cxx
has caused the Debian Bug report #1027746,
regarding transition: log4cxx
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1027746: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1027746
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: log4cxx@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:log4cxx
Hi,
I'm currently preparing for log4cxx13 -> log4cxx15 transition.
(SO_NAME 14 had been skipped by upstream)
All it's r-depends builds fine, and there are only three, I anticipate
a smooth transition:
R-Dependees are:
solarpowerlog ✔
ros-rosconsole ✔
ros-ros-comm ✔
(zookeeper is B-D on log4cxx, however it is not using it, #1027732)
Waiting for the green light from you ;-)
--
tobi
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2023-01-09 19:04:17 +0100, Tobias Frost wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> thanks for the go ahead!
>
> On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 19:42:13 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> >
> > Please go ahead.
>
> Uploaded to unstable and it has been built on all archs already… :)
> I guess it is ready to schedule the binNMUs :)
The old binaries got removed. Closing
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: