Bug#1028436: transition: re2
Control: tags -1 trixie
On 2023-01-10 19:22:20 -0400, Stefano Rivera wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: re2@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:re2
>
> Sorry for a last minute request. I was just looking through my packages
> on the weekend and noticed that re2 had tagged a new release, but I
> hadn't seen it due to the GitHub layout change last year.
>
> This is a very minor ABI break in the C++ library, caused by changing
> class layout.
>
> The in the 6 months since the previous release, they've only made 22
> commits. Which also means that if it misses the freeze, it's probably
> not a big deal.
Then let's do it early in the trixie release cycle.
Cheers
>
> The new version is currently sitting in experimental bin-NEW.
>
> I've test-built the reverse dependencies, they all build, except for
> unrelated failures:
>
> $ grep ^Status *.build
> chromium_amd64.build:Status: successful
> clickhouse_amd64.build:Status: successful
> dnsdist_amd64.build:Status: successful
> effcee_amd64.build:Status: attempted
> grpc_amd64.build:Status: successful
> inspircd_amd64.build:Status: successful
> libphonenumber_amd64.build:Status: successful
> libpog_amd64.build:Status: successful
> libre-engine-re2-perl_amd64.build:Status: successful
> libvmod-re2_amd64.build:Status: successful
> node-re2_amd64.build:Status: successful
> pytorch-text_amd64.build:Status: given-back
> qt6-webengine_amd64.build:Status: successful
> qtwebengine-opensource-src_amd64.build:Status: attempted
> re2_20221201+dfsg-1_amd64.build:Status: successful
> ruby-re2_amd64.build:Status: successful
> sphinxsearch_amd64.build:Status: successful
>
> effcee: FTBFS with GCC-11: #984048
> pytorch-text: FTBFS with Python 3.10 (yes 3.10, not 3.11): #1008924
> qtwebengine-opensource-src: FTBFS with Python 3.11 (fixed in 5.15.12+dfsg-1 in experimental)
>
> Ben file:
>
> title = "re2";
> is_affected = .depends ~ "libre2-9" | .depends ~ "libre2-10";
> is_good = .depends ~ "libre2-10";
> is_bad = .depends ~ "libre2-9";
>
> Thanks for the consideration!
>
> Stefano
>
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: