Quoting Paul Gevers (2023-02-10 21:14:52) > On 09-02-2023 23:59, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > I can only interpret that as the test environment on thos arches being > > broken. Please don't punish the package for that :-( > > I think your interpretation it wrong. librust-rustls-dev Depends on > librust-ring-0.16+default-dev which is only available on amd64, arm64, > armel, armhf and i386. The test used to be skipped on ppc64el and s390x, > because you had skip-not-installable enabled, so the results were > neutral. You removed the skip-not-installable restriction, so now the > test fails. The regression is your own making, don't blame the test > environment. Ah, I am very sorry for throwing blame with stuff I don't understand. I shall stop doing that! > Having said that, as I mentioned before I regret I added the > skip-not-installable restriction, although it has it's use of giving > maintainers some control. I'll add the hint shortly. > > > There seems to be same problem for rust-oxhttp, and rust-hyper-rustls. > > Do you want a separate bugreport for each, or is it fine just mentioning > > it here? > > I'll have a look and if they're fine, I'll handle them too. Thanks! - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature