Bug#1033942: nmu: ppl_1:1.2-8.1

[Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>]

Hi Lev,

On 05-04-2023 07:38, Lev Lamberov wrote:
> Вт 04 апр 2023 @ 21:42 Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>:
> > On 04-04-2023 15:05, Lev Lamberov wrote:
> > > Please, rebuild ppl against swi-prolog 9.0.4+dfsg-2 in unstable. The
> > > ppl package in unstable and testing was build against the older
> > > swi-prolog version, containing older library. For more information,
> > > please see this swi-prolog [bug].
> > >
> > > [bug] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033636
> >
> > It's a shame we discussed this in bug 1022253 [1]. Do you know what was
> > flawed in our assessment?
> >
> > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022253#24
>
> Yes, turns out I was wrong.

I've scheduled the binNMU's, but as discussed in bug 1033636, please fix 
this properly after the bookworm release. Following standard workflows 
prevents this particular problem.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature