[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1033942: marked as done (nmu: ppl_1:1.2-8.1)

Your message dated Wed, 3 May 2023 23:02:18 +0200
with message-id <ZFLL2rhUQrZpeQ16@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1033942: nmu: ppl_1:1.2-8.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033942,
regarding nmu: ppl_1:1.2-8.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1033942: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033942
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: ppl@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ppl

Hi,

Please, rebuild ppl against swi-prolog 9.0.4+dfsg-2 in unstable. The
ppl package in unstable and testing was build against the older
swi-prolog version, containing older library. For more information,
please see this swi-prolog [bug].

[bug] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033636

The command is as follows:

nmu ppl_1:1.2-8.1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against swi-prolog 9.0.4+dfsg-2"

With regards,
Lev Lamberov

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2023-04-06 16:07:50 +0500, Lev Lamberov wrote:
> Hi Paul,
> 
> Чт 06 апр 2023 @ 12:05 Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>:
> 
> > On 05-04-2023 07:38, Lev Lamberov wrote:
> >> Вт 04 апр 2023 @ 21:42 Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>:
> >>> On 04-04-2023 15:05, Lev Lamberov wrote:
> >>>> Please, rebuild ppl against swi-prolog 9.0.4+dfsg-2 in unstable. The
> >>>> ppl package in unstable and testing was build against the older
> >>>> swi-prolog version, containing older library. For more information,
> >>>> please see this swi-prolog [bug].
> >>>>
> >>>> [bug] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033636
> >>>
> >>> It's a shame we discussed this in bug 1022253 [1]. Do you know what was
> >>> flawed in our assessment?
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1022253#24
> >> 
> >> Yes, turns out I was wrong.
> >
> > I've scheduled the binNMU's, but as discussed in bug 1033636, please fix 
> > this properly after the bookworm release. Following standard workflows 
> > prevents this particular problem.
> 
> Thank you!

The binNMUs migrated. Let's close this bug.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
Reply to: