[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1033838: marked as done (unblock: devscripts [pre-approval])

Your message dated Thu, 1 Jun 2023 11:48:14 +0200
with message-id <36914dcb-eca7-0ea8-c86c-4969de6570d1@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1033838: release.debian.org: Pre-merge review for devscripts
has caused the Debian Bug report #1033838,
regarding unblock: devscripts [pre-approval]
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1033838: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033838
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: devscripts@packages.debian.org

Hi release team,

I was discussing with Mattia Rizzolo the open merge requests for
devscripts and which of them are material for the bookworm release. It
would be nice to have
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/-/merge_requests/310
("Devscripts::Compression: Switch to new Dpkg::Compression getters") in
bookworm. What's your take on that change? Can we merge it for bookworm
or should we wait until the bookworm release is done?

-- 
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

On 07-05-2023 22:21, Paul Gevers wrote:

Hi,

On 16-04-2023 22:22, Paul Gevers wrote:

On 02-04-2023 16:31, Benjamin Drung wrote:

I was discussing with Mattia Rizzolo the open merge requests for
devscripts and which of them are material for the bookworm release.
*Before* we discuss this, can you please handle the version skew we currently have? In other words, can you file an unblock request for what we have in unstable if it needs to migrate, which we probably want as it fixes a grave bug?
Ping. Following the freeze policy I want a revert to the previous version with a targeted fix for the grave bug. The time for wishlist bugfixes in key packages is over.
It's a shame this wasn't picked up. This request has expired because it's now too late for these kind of things. We'll carry the grave bug to bookworm. It can still be fixed via a point release update. 

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: