[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1040001: transition: r-base



Hi Andreas,

On 30-06-2023 21:35, Andreas Tille wrote:
I'm not sure that we are in the right status to ask for a transition bug

Anytime is good to ask for a transition, particularly when the transition is already ongoing.

   https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2023/06/msg00025.html
     In the end of this mail three options are listed which I simply
     repeat here for your comfort:

    1. implement the r-graphics-api-*
       This might be a bit complex since for the moment I do not know
       any means how to detect the packages that need this dependency
       (and how we can implement this into dh-update-R)  So this might
       become technically complex in the first case

    2. Just do a full r-api transition
       This would work but affects more packages than strictly
       necessary.  My gut feeling says we will be able to finish this
       earlier than 1. despite technically not perfect

    3. Blindly ignore the fact that we need a transition and follow
       the hackish workaround by using random versioned Depends as
       suggested by Nilesh for r-cran-epi.

While I would love to hear the opinion of the release team what kind of
transition (1. or 2.) should be prefered (if this is possible now at all
since the affected package r-base 4.3.1 is in the archive since some
time and also the most urgent packages are rebuild manually) or whether
we need to fight manually through this mess (option 3.)  I confirm that
I agree with Johannes Ranke to prefer option 1. and do it "right" to be
safe for the next time.

I don't think it should surprise anyone that we prefer it to be done right. Our preference is for option 1. However, if you can't get the pieces for that option in place in a reasonable time (say, a week or two, take some time to try), then we prefer to get *this* transition out of the way by means of option 2. I don't think it's in anybodies interest to waste time on option 3.

Sorry that this transition bug is that complex.  I would have loved if
it would went more coordinated but unfortunately that's not in my hands
and I simply try to reassemble the pieces.

Thanks for communicating with us, much appreciated.

I'll try to set a placeholder transition tracker up soon; for now, by lack of something better, will reflect option 2. We can update that once we have the pieces for option 1.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: