Bug#1055907: marked as done (nmu: libalien-wxwidgets-perl_0.69+dfsg-6+b3)
Your message dated Sat, 18 Nov 2023 19:51:21 +0000
with message-id <54db87cde8e3f07a3ecbbf14b989c6e3dc1fc1be.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#1055907: nmu: libalien-wxwidgets-perl_0.69+dfsg-6+b3
has caused the Debian Bug report #1055907,
regarding nmu: libalien-wxwidgets-perl_0.69+dfsg-6+b3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1055907: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055907
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: libalien-wxwidgets-perl@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libalien-wxwidgets-perl
nmu libalien-wxwidgets-perl_0.69+dfsg-6+b3 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild for wxwidgets3.2 (3.2.4+dfsg-1)"
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 2023-11-18 at 16:21 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net> (2023-11-16):
> > > Scott Talbert <swt@techie.net> (2023-11-13):
> > > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > > Severity: normal
> > > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > > Usertags: binnmu
> > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: libalien-wxwidgets-perl@packages.debian.org
> > > > Control: affects -1 + src:libalien-wxwidgets-perl
> > > >
> > > > nmu libalien-wxwidgets-perl_0.69+dfsg-6+b3 . ANY . unstable . -
> > > > m "Rebuild for wxwidgets3.2 (3.2.4+dfsg-1)"
> > >
> > > This looks like a redux of #1054146, with libwx-perl also needing
> > > a
> > > binNMU (after the libalien-wxwidgets-perl one)?
> >
> > Yeah, I did at least file both at the same time this round though
> > :)
> > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055908
>
> I was trying to suggest filing both in the same request, to have them
> scheduled in one go.
Yes, please. #1055908 also doesn't mention the dependency between the
binNMUs.
> In any case, actually binNMUing both packages would be nice, as we've
> been lacking d-i daily builds for some days already.
Done.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: