[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1059898: marked as done (unblock: steam-installer/1:1.0.0.78~ds-4)

Your message dated Thu, 4 Jan 2024 13:58:57 +0100
with message-id <970d6aee-05cc-44a0-bcea-62657aa2c382@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#1059898: unblock: steam-installer/1:1.0.0.78~ds-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1059898,
regarding unblock: steam-installer/1:1.0.0.78~ds-4
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1059898: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059898
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: steam-installer@packages.debian.org, debian-ci@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:steam-installer

steam-installer doesn't seem to be migrating, and its excuses page
presents an empty list of reasons why not.

In the HTML output, under "Additional info" (which if I understand
correctly is meant to be for notes that do not affect migration), it
says:

- Additional info:
    - uninstallable on arch amd64, not running autopkgtest there
    - uninstallable on arch i386, not running autopkgtest there

but in the YAML output, I see that actually this might be the reason why
it isn't migrating:

    autopkgtest:
      verdict: REJECTED_TEMPORARILY
  ...
  reason:
  - autopkgtest

I find this confusing, because steam-installer doesn't have any autopkgtest
coverage at all.

The steam-installer:amd64 contrib binary package is uninstallable if you
don't have an i386 foreign architecture added, because Valve's proprietary
code has hard dependencies on both amd64 and i386 libraries. Is this
perhaps what the migration software is unhappy about? But I thought we
could have uninstallable packages as long as they are not a regression?

Similarly, the steam:i386 contrib binary package is uninstallable unless
you are actually on an amd64 system.

The other binary packages (in main) should be installable on their
appropriate architectures with no special measures.

Thanks,
    smcv

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi all,

On 03-01-2024 22:04, Simon McVittie wrote:

On Wed, 03 Jan 2024 at 20:51:46 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:

Thanks for letting us know. I prefer to keep the status quo for a day such
that I can debug this tomorrow.


That's absolutely fine, this particular migration is not urgent and can
remain stuck for another few days or weeks if necessary.
I have pushed a change to britney2 that fixes the issue for steam-installer (and two other packages that are not installable on arm64).
While at it, I realized more and more that the current implementation is a layer violation, but that will be for some other time. 

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: