[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1059358: marked as done (transition: wolfssl)

Your message dated Fri, 5 Jan 2024 22:13:47 +0100
with message-id <ZZhxC5MMQKbx9sGH@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1059358: transition: wolfssl
has caused the Debian Bug report #1059358,
regarding transition: wolfssl
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1059358: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059358
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Control: affects -1 wolfssl
X-Debbugs-Cc: wolfssl@packages.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Severity: normal
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-wolfssl.html

wolfssl is available in experimental with libwolfssl42.
This transition is from libwolfssl41.
The auto-generated Ben file is okay and all reverse dependencies build fine.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2023-12-27 21:19:54 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> Hi Bastian
> 
> On 2023-12-23 14:30:39 +0100, Bastian Germann wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Control: affects -1 wolfssl
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: wolfssl@packages.debian.org
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > Severity: normal
> > Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-wolfssl.html
> > 
> > wolfssl is available in experimental with libwolfssl42.
> > This transition is from libwolfssl41.
> > The auto-generated Ben file is okay and all reverse dependencies build fine.
> 
> Please go ahead.

The old binaries got removed.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
Reply to: