Bug#1067120: marked as done (nmu: apache2_2.4.58-1)
Your message dated Wed, 27 Mar 2024 09:57:50 +0100
with message-id <ZgPfjofxq1HQWdBb@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1067120: nmu: apache2_2.4.58-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #1067120,
regarding nmu: apache2_2.4.58-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1067120: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1067120
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: apache2@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:apache2
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
libaprutil1t64 1.6.3-1.1 contains a wrong symbol file, causing a wrong
dependency on libaprutil164 (missing a "t") for packages using the
apr_dbd_init or apr_ldap_init symbols. AFAICS, only apache2 is affected.
Note that there is already apache2 2.4.58-1+b2 . I am not sure which
version is the correct one in the nmu syntax.
nmu apache2_2.4.58-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with fixed libaprutil1t64 for #1067035"
dw apache2_2.4.58-1 . ANY . -m "libaprutil1-dev (>= 1.6.3-2)"
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2024-03-18 21:27:35 +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: apache2@packages.debian.org
> Control: affects -1 + src:apache2
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> libaprutil1t64 1.6.3-1.1 contains a wrong symbol file, causing a wrong
> dependency on libaprutil164 (missing a "t") for packages using the
> apr_dbd_init or apr_ldap_init symbols. AFAICS, only apache2 is affected.
>
> Note that there is already apache2 2.4.58-1+b2 . I am not sure which
> version is the correct one in the nmu syntax.
>
> nmu apache2_2.4.58-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with fixed libaprutil1t64 for #1067035"
> dw apache2_2.4.58-1 . ANY . -m "libaprutil1-dev (>= 1.6.3-2)"
Rebuilds happened a week ago.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: