On Mon, 2023-01-23 at 10:35 +0100, Andre Heider wrote: > Can we please have spice back? > > It's been half a year, and my patch with an alternative solution still > works fine with 1.4.29 (which is what I'm using for that period on a > daily basis): > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1015147#27 > > Thanks, > Andre > Hi, All related issues were solved in version 1.4.28, so the 1.4.29 in unstable can have builds re- enabled for spice and www plugins. However... Please be sensitive in fixes for backport builds as this package is in bullseye backports. 1.4.29 can be built with both 'libsoup2.4 and webkit2gtk 4.0' and 'libsoup3 and webkit2gtk 4.1' with spice and www plugins enabled. Regards Phil -- *** Playing the game for the games own sake. *** Associations: * Debian Maintainer (DM) * Fedora/EPEL Maintainer. * Contributor member of the AlmaLinux foundation. WWW: https://kathenas.org Buy Me a Coffee: https://www.buymeacoffee.com/kathenasorg Twitter: @kathenasorg Instagram: @kathenasorg IRC: kathenas GPG: 724AA9B52F024C8B
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part