Bug#1016007: marked as done (reportbug: The prompt “Does this bug still exist in version X…” requires a binary answer when there are 3 possibilities)
Your message dated Sun, 04 Dec 2022 18:53:34 +0000
with message-id <E1p1u7K-003CA3-14@fasolo.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#1016007: fixed in reportbug 11.6.0
has caused the Debian Bug report #1016007,
regarding reportbug: The prompt “Does this bug still exist in version X…” requires a binary answer when there are 3 possibilities
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1016007: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1016007
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: reportbug: The prompt “Does this bug still exist in version X…” requires a binary answer when there are 3 possibilities
- From: anonymous coward <debbug.reportbug@sideload.33mail.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2022 10:25:25 +0200
- Message-id: <165873752584.51442.8924380289207611664.reportbug@cypher>
Package: reportbug
Version: 7.10.3+deb11u1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debbug.reportbug@sideload.33mail.com
In responding to this bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=880877
reportbug prompted with:
Does this bug still exist in version 7.10.3+deb11u1 of this package [y|N|q|?]?
Luckily I happened to know the answer, but this is not always the
case. Forcing users to answer this question with “y” or “n”
facilitates misinfo, because a user who does not know if their
particular version at the moment has the bug may opt to give an
arbitrary answer instead of testing. Maybe they can’t test. Maybe
testing the bug requires a complex/elaborate setup. There needs to be
an option to skip this question.
-- Package-specific info:
** Environment settings:
EDITOR="emacs"
INTERFACE="text"
** /home/blee/.reportbugrc:
reportbug_version "7.10.3"
mode advanced
ui text
realname "anonymous coward"
email "tripr@a5dkbvgakon2lxmauleiizkv6i3s36wp6w3i32a3buc4xmtdnbttmryd.onion"
no-cc
list-cc-me
smtphost reportbug.debian.org
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.4
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (990, 'stable-updates'), (990, 'stable-security'), (990, 'testing'), (990, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-16-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages reportbug depends on:
ii apt 2.2.4
ii python3 3.9.2-3
ii python3-reportbug 7.10.3+deb11u1
ii sensible-utils 0.0.14
reportbug recommends no packages.
Versions of packages reportbug suggests:
pn claws-mail <none>
pn debconf-utils <none>
pn debsums <none>
pn dlocate <none>
ii emacs-bin-common 1:27.1+1-3.1
ii file 1:5.39-3
ii gnupg 2.2.27-2+deb11u2
ii postfix [mail-transport-agent] 3.5.13-0+deb11u1
ii python3-urwid 2.1.2-1
pn reportbug-gtk <none>
ii xdg-utils 1.1.3-4.1
Versions of packages python3-reportbug depends on:
ii apt 2.2.4
ii file 1:5.39-3
ii python3 3.9.2-3
ii python3-apt 2.2.1
ii python3-debian 0.1.39
ii python3-debianbts 3.1.0
ii python3-requests 2.25.1+dfsg-2
ii sensible-utils 0.0.14
python3-reportbug suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: reportbug
Source-Version: 11.6.0
Done: Nis Martensen <nis.martensen@web.de>
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
reportbug, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive.
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 1016007@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Nis Martensen <nis.martensen@web.de> (supplier of updated reportbug package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@ftp-master.debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2022 19:28:36 +0100
Source: reportbug
Architecture: source
Version: 11.6.0
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Reportbug Maintainers <debian-reportbug@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Nis Martensen <nis.martensen@web.de>
Closes: 1004221 1012234 1013254 1014869 1014871 1015933 1016007 1018748 1020297 1021481 1021849 1023786 1024629 1024685
Changes:
reportbug (11.6.0) unstable; urgency=medium
.
[ Paul Wise ]
* reportbug/debbugs.py: Add usertags for ftp.d.o removal requests
(Closes: #1004221)
* man/reportbug.conf.5, conf/reportbug.conf: Don't mention using the header
option to set X-Debbugs-CC
* doc/README.Users: Drop mention of X-Debbugs-Cc being moved from
pseudo-header to mail headers
* reportbug/debbugs.py, test/test_debbugs.py: Notify packages of bugs
against pseudo-packages that affect them
.
[ Holger Wansing ]
* reportbug/debbugs.py: mention log file location in installer template
(Closes: #1015933)
.
[ Daniel Lewart ]
* reportbug/debbugs.py: override: extra priority is deprecated
(Closes: #1018748)
.
[ Nis Martensen ]
* reportbug.utils.get_dependency_info(): implement line wrapping.
Thanks to Sandro Tosi for the suggestion
* reportbug.utils.get_dependency_info(): fix min pkgname column width
(Closes: #1024685)
* bin/reportbug: ask CC addresses also if list-cc-me is set (Closes: #1023786)
* reportbug/debbugs.py: use upstream contact instead of author in template
(Closes: #1020297)
* reportbug/bugreport.py: add 'UP' on non-SMP machines (Closes: #1021849)
* bin/reportbug: get submit address from resumed message (Closes: #1021481)
* reportbug.utils.get_source_version: avoid guessing between multiple answers
(Closes: #1024629)
* bin/reportbug: drop safety check for msg changes for resumed reports
(Closes: #1014871)
* fix "bin/reportbug: get submit address from resumed message"
* bin/reportbug: display some advice if called with general package argument
(Closes: #1012234)
* bin/reportbug: do not ignore --subject option with -N (Closes: #1013254)
* bin/reportbug: rephrase version confirmation question (Closes: #1016007)
* reportbug/submit.py: Do not use mta -f with empty envelopefrom
(Closes: #1014869)
Checksums-Sha1:
8c8dfc92a0138f49cb6cdb2054210730caf85a2e 1888 reportbug_11.6.0.dsc
b0a87917f7215188f4e6f3c5f79c414b66c34268 212928 reportbug_11.6.0.tar.xz
da623ddb52c3be9247b58e5a1b244d3a069680df 7850 reportbug_11.6.0_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
ecc7e896dd9ecfd4bc6f46863bed414bb1d0e6c516296209dac7841a339166c2 1888 reportbug_11.6.0.dsc
be2ba079361f30412d382edf06e405b104fa5808503bad834e536eff2db21a84 212928 reportbug_11.6.0.tar.xz
36429078b675a55bd776c12863e2fe91993b9d0f66ae3c356ad65e951d07fa08 7850 reportbug_11.6.0_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
cba7509af279e0692c1f96c116d20d66 1888 utils standard reportbug_11.6.0.dsc
2aa4d9df85decaec66eb759755ae068f 212928 utils standard reportbug_11.6.0.tar.xz
ed36042cabe70e2139d02864b6a67578 7850 utils standard reportbug_11.6.0_amd64.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=s3Gu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
Reply to: