Re: Ruby packaging in wheezy: gem2deb, new policy, etc.
- To: debian-ruby@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Ruby packaging in wheezy: gem2deb, new policy, etc.
- From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net>
- Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2011 14:17:26 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20110301131726.GA16848@xanadu.blop.info>
- In-reply-to: <20110228185053.GA19062@softwarelivre.org>
- References: <20110129110316.GA8385@softwarelivre.org> <20110130152304.GA4765@xanadu.blop.info> <20110131012008.GA10916@softwarelivre.org> <20110218170735.GA23587@xanadu.blop.info> <20110225001040.GC4563@softwarelivre.org> <4D6A4C8F.70908@melix.org> <20110227153153.GA21301@xanadu.blop.info> <20110228082541.GA18989@xanadu.blop.info> <20110228164914.GC7425@softwarelivre.org> <20110228185053.GA19062@softwarelivre.org>
On 28/02/11 at 15:50 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Antonio Terceiro escreveu isso aí:
> > Lucas Nussbaum escreveu isso aí:
> > > So, according to the feedback on debian-devel@, we should probably
> > > duplicate the arch-independent part in every arch-dependent package, or
> > > introduce a ruby-foo-common package that contains the common parts.
> > >
> > > I suggest that we just duplicate the files if it doesn't prevent
> > > co-installability (i.e there are no files shipped in /usr/share, for
> > > example). And switch to ruby-foo-common if it's required to bring
> > > co-installability, or if the arch-independant parts are really huge.
> >
> > I've updated the wiki page to reflect this.
> >
> > > Now we need someone to implement this in gem2deb. hint hint. :-)
> >
> > On the way. :-)
>
> https://github.com/terceiro/gem2deb/commit/90112545fdfb7c78a03f3836c08ab949925b7e85
Thanks a lot! merged.
So, what needs to be done before we:
- ask debian-devel@ for a review
- upload gem2deb
?
L.
Reply to: