On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 03:46:43PM -0400, Caitlin Matos wrote: > On 15/09/14 06:34 PM, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > >On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 08:07:30PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 12:13:25PM -0400, Caitlin Matos wrote: > >>>I have updated rake in git. I have also made several changes to the > >>>packaging. The RDoc documentation is now built and included in a separate > >>>binary package, rake-doc. I have created a new manpage, and have also > >>>submitted it upstream. > >>> > >>>Please have a look as time permits. > >> > >>It looks good, thanks! > >> > >>Point I would like to have addressed before uploading: > >> > >>- I would like to not add the -doc package for now (see my message on > >> that topic) > > > >FYI, for now I reverted the commit that added the -doc package and > >uploaded. Thanks for your work on it! > > Hi, > > Unfortunately, the change after that made several updates to the manpage, > one of which was to refer to rake-doc. I have uploaded a new version to git > with this reference removed, as well as bumping the standards. Can you > please review this new update? I would, but it seems that you forgot to push your changes. -- Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature