On Monday, 25 April 2016 4:37:56 PM AEST Hleb Valoshka wrote:
> If ghi is the only consumer of ruby-ghi then I don't see any reason to
> introduce a new package. So I suggest to merge.
Thank you, I'll consider merging.
It is true that for now there are no packages depending on "ruby-ghi".
But eventually there are may be some packages that need it. Since library is
exposed to global name space it is better to install it by proper library
package.
Could you please kindly advise me (or mention example packages) how to
install private Ruby library? At the moment I don't know how to do that.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Dmitry Smirnov.
---
Truth — Something somehow discreditable to someone.
-- H. L. Mencken, 1949
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.