Re: meet package
Hi Mattia,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:19:05AM +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 10:17:05AM +0000, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > oh, gosh.
> > well, I was meaning you, Tille ;)
> >
> > I must admit that its equivalent in Italy (Andrea) is not *that*
> > frequent, indeed :)
And I can confirm that Italians are usually addressing me as Andrea
which in German is the matching name for women. ;-)
> Also, I just realized I wrote a package name that doesn't exist, I'm
> talking about src:teem
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/teem.git
Well, *this* package really rings a bell. :-) I noticed the NMU and I
somehow have put integrating the changes on my todo list but not very on
top. In the Git repository I think I have closed the open bugs as well
- hmmm, I did not finished the package to my standards which would have
been replacing cdbs by dh and use d-shlibs. I discussed this on Debian
Science list in January[1] which ended up in a discussion about the need
of static libraries since d-shlibs is requiring one but the build system
does not creat both. We had a similar discussion at debian-mentors
(also triggered by me for libsdsl) some days before.
IMHO the best thing to do would be if I'd commit my dh based rules file
comment the d-shlibmove call and leave it for reviewing. I'd be
perfectly fine if you'd take over a review since I'd be busy with lots
of other challenges.
Kind regards
Andreas.
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-science/2016/01/msg00053.html
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: